The spreadsheet is to be found here :
I remind you of my 'globe10' results :
- DOD133 :
Other results are probably statistical artefacts and should not be taken into account. Let's see some other populations' results.
1. Neolithic hunter-gatherers (Gotland - South Sweden)
See this article for more data on those ancient samples :
See this article for more data on those ancient samples :
- Ajv52 :
- Ajv70 :
Quite clearly, the modern component labelled as "Atlantic-Baltic" constituted most of the genetic variation of hunter-gatherers in Neolithic Gotland (Sweden).
Other components are quite exotic and might hint to an archaic variation that had not yet disappeared from Europe, either because of subsequent mixing or because it simply got to change. The algorithm might also just fail to successfully interpretate around 8% of those people's variation as it cannot be found in modern humans anymore.
2. Neolithic farmer (Götaland - South Sweden)
- Gok4 :
Those results are quite distinct from neighbouring hunter-gatherers from the island of Gotland : that Neolithic "Swedish" farmer shows results more on par with modern European variations. The Southern component has now appeared : it peaks amongst the Mozabite population in Algeria (around 50% of the genetic variation) and Palestinian people.
Undoubtedly enough, this component was brought by farmer migrants coming from the Middle-East who mixed with aboriginal hunter-gatherers. Those migrants probably had already mixed with aboriginal Europeans during their journey.
Let's simplify things : let's say our farmer is what resulted from the meeting of 1 migrant farmer male and 1 female hunter-gatherer akin to the ones in Gotland. The father was thus around 67,4% Southern (as opposed to the mother's 0,00%) : such result is not to be found amongst modern populations. No population is that high on Southern.
Mathematical models could be developed taking more generations into account but that would be highly hypothetical : actually, we don't know much of Neolithic demographics.
Another issue is that modern populations heavily loaded on "Southern" like Bedouin people also show strong "West Asian" affinities which are non-existent in Neolithic farmers. "West Asian" peaks amongst Balochi people. Did aboriginal Near-Easterners and Caucasian people subsequently mix with people from the Iranian plateau ?
The question remains : where is the source of that "Southern" component ? Quite probably somewhere in the Near-East but bearers of this variation are not to be found unaltered. Still, it is pretty obvious that the "Southern" component is to be linked with farming.
3. Swedish people
- Swedish_D : (14 people)
At first sight, it is obvious modern Swedish people are a mix of Neolithic Swedish farmers (provided the likes of Gok4 were stabilized) and the last Neolithic Swedish hunter-gatherers : the proportions could be guessed through statistical models (I'm too rusty to develop them : I haven't studied maths for 10 years ...).
The "West Asian" component was probably brought up by a subsequent migration. Modern-day Caucasian people are around 50% for that component : if we suppose they reached Sweden unaltered, which is probably wrong, that means they were outnumbered by a 1:10 ratio, more than one Caucasian great-grandparent for 7 autochtonous great-grandparents.
It may be hasty but I believe that the "West Asian" component is to be linked with the introduction of Indo-European languages in Europe.
NB : The "South Asian" in modern Europeans is ambiguous (both for Swedes and myself), I won't tackle that issue now.
4. Ötzi (Copper Age Alps)
- Oetzi :
Ötzi's remains were found in the Italian Alps, in modern-day German-speaking Tyrol. Pollen analyses have proved Ötzi was autochtonous to the area.
The Copper Age is transitional between Neolithic times and the Bronze Age when Indo-Europeans reached Europe. It looks like Ötzi had already suffered "West Asian" influence, circa 5.70%.
The Atlantic/Southern ratio is pretty balanced which can only mean people like Ötzi vastly descended from Neolithic farmers, as much as they descended from aboriginal Upper-Paleolithic people.
5. North Italian people
- North_Italian : (11 people)
Considering modern-day South Tyrolians partly descend from German-speaking colonists who settled in the Alps from the 8th century onwards, I believe North Italians are more interesting to compare even though I lament the lack of more localized Italian samples.
The "West Asian" in modern-day North Italians is 3 times higher than it was in Ötzi which means North Italy suffered intense migrations in the Bronze Age. These migrations probably brought Indo-European languages.
The Atlantic/Southern ratio is now largely unbalanced : the only explaination is that newcomers in the Bronze Age were both high on the "Atlantic" component and the "West Asian" one, lower on "Southern" ratio wise. Celtic migrations from central Europe ? Unless Ötzi was not representative of the North Italians in those times.
6. Sardinian people
- Sardinian : (25 people)
Amongst the modern populations of Western Europe, not taking South Italians into consideration, Sardinians are the ones showing the lowest Atlantic/Southern ratio, not that far from Ötzi's one. I'd like to add it somehow shows in their more extreme phenotypes even though this is just speculation.
Sardinians rather escaped Bronze Age migrations which brought the "West Asian" component into Western Europe : 2.40% is low. The fact that placenames in mountainous Sardinia appear to be superficially Basco-Iberian-looking is a proof that the "West Asian" component is to be linked with Indo-European languages.
Nevertheless the Basque language, ancient Iberian and ancient Sardinia are not necessarily Upper Paleolithic languages : they could very well be the language of Neolithic farmers or some sort of Neolithic pidgin.
To be followed ...